.I was referring to the reference discs they sent, and detecting objectionable sibilance while listening . Do you think I should I change the wording of my post from "pressing" to "reference" to avoid further confusion?
Since this is a thread about pressing I was just pointing out where in the process the problem likely occurred. The three processes involved are cutting, plating and pressing. It helps with QC. Giving the pressing plant a hard time about a sibilance problem won't get you very far. I realize that Musicol does cutting as well as pressing. I assume they cut it and your post was shorthand.
Perhaps. However, I was under the impression that Palomino had done the cutting, hence the discussion about diameter EQ.
Is it wise to discuss "pressing" without discussing "cutting"? I doubt that any issues here would be specific to "pressing". For tha matter, I've only heard refs of the last dozen or so LPs I worked on.. I'll have to ask for some released pressings...!